On 30.04.26 14:29, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> We create a pg_type entry for a property graph, but it's not used
> anywhere and it doesn't make sense to create a type for a property
> graph which doesn't hold any rows or can be associated with a specific
> result type. We have other pg_class entries which do not have a type
> associated with them. I think we should do the same for property graph
> as well. Here's patch with that change. It doesn't show any failure in
> make check as well.
Agreed, committed. I included a catversion bump.
