Re: MaxOffsetNumber for Table AMs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Davis
Subject Re: MaxOffsetNumber for Table AMs
Date
Msg-id 2d8ce12170ce37ab42b7bb5860df63f2b38bbf09.camel@j-davis.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: MaxOffsetNumber for Table AMs  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2021-05-05 at 08:50 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> There just isn't that
> many table AM TID designs that could ever work, and even among those
> schemes that could ever work there is a pretty clear hierarchy. This
> blue sky thinking about generalizing TIDs 2 years in seems *weird* to
> me.

I am happy to keep table AM discussions concrete, as I have plenty of
concrete problems which I would like to turn into proposals.

Regards,
    Jeff Davis





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: MaxOffsetNumber for Table AMs
Next
From: Chapman Flack
Date:
Subject: Re: COPY table_name (single_column) FROM 'iso-8859-1.txt' DELIMITER E'\n'