On 2021/12/24 18:44, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> I once thought the same, but that change causes buildfarms *always*
> truncate the resulting application name. I believe the base
> application_name and database_name never grows further longer. So I'd
> like to split the check to %a%u%% and %d%p.
Yeah, probably it's better to split the test in that way. So I attached the patch doing that at the original thread [1]
inpgsql-hackers. Let's discuss this there.
[1]
https://postgr.es/m/e7b61420-a97b-8246-77c4-a0d48fba5a45@oss.nttdata.com
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION