Re: Anyone running on RHEL Cluster? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Mikko Partio
Subject Re: Anyone running on RHEL Cluster?
Date
Msg-id 2ca799770712280012k63641aeap13dfd54eed4dc59@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Anyone running on RHEL Cluster?  ("Chris Hoover" <revoohc@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance


On Dec 26, 2007 7:36 PM, Chris Hoover <revoohc@gmail.com> wrote:
Is anyone running their production PostgreSQL server on the RHEL Cluster software?  If so, how is it working for you?  My linux admin is looking at trying to increase the robustness of our environment and wanting to try and eliminate as many single points of failure as possible.

So, I am looking for any hands on experience in running PostgreSQL in some sort of HA cluster.


I was looking for the same information previously this year ( http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2007-08/msg00910.php). At that time I concluded that using drbd for data replication was probably better choice than using RHCS and shared storage, but afterwards the requirements for the cluster changed so that drbd was no longer a suitable choice, and we ended up with building a RHCS cluster with shared disk and gfs.

The cluster has been working as expected and not counting a few minor annoyances I haven't had any problems with it (this is with RHEL 5.1). My initial fear was that somehow two postmasters could be accessing the same set of file but after testing I have not been able to produce this (ie. the fencing is working). So overall I see no reason not to go with RHCS if it satisifies your business requirements.

Regards

M

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Evaluation of PG performance vs MSDE/MSSQL 2000 (not 2005)