Re: pg_reorg in core? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Sabino Mullane
Subject Re: pg_reorg in core?
Date
Msg-id 2b64114dc1c9312dae598c2e98a5dd98@biglumber.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_reorg in core?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: pg_reorg in core?
List pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160


>> I think it's time to consider some *umbrella project* for maintaining
>> several small projects outside the core.
>
> Well, that was pgfoundry, and it didn't work out.

I'm not sure that is quite analogous to what was being proposed. 
I read it as more of "let's package a bunch of these small utilities 
together into a single project", such that installing one installs them 
all (e.g. aptitude install pg_tools), and they all have a single bug 
tracker, etc. That tracker could be github, of course.

I'm not convinced of the merit of that plan, but that's an alternative 
interpretation that doesn't involve our beloved pgfoundry. :)

Oh, and -1 for putting it in core. Way too early, and not 
important enough.

- -- 
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201209222334
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAlBeg/AACgkQvJuQZxSWSsjL5ACgimT71B4lSb1ELhgMw5EBzAKs
xHIAn08vxGzmM6eSmDfZfxlJDTousq7h
=KgXW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: johnlumby
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal and patch : support INSERT INTO...RETURNING with partitioned table using rule
Next
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: 64-bit API for large object