On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > I believe that our intention is the same with the pgsql-us-general in
> > that it is the general United States list.
>
> Well, that is not what Selena said. Her agenda was quite specific.
:) I was giving examples of what we might talk about. I was not
creating a definitive list of every topic we would ever allow.
I understand what you're getting at, Peter.
We've started categorizing things a bit better with the groups, but I
don't think that adding -usergroups to the end of the name really
captures what is happening any better than -general does. In fact,
-usergroups is even more misleading, because it will be confused with
the PUGs.
And, at the end, I don't have a better naming convention in mind
either. I have been thinking about it, but everything i've come up
with is no better than what we have.
-selena
--
Selena Deckelmann
United States PostgreSQL Association - http://www.postgresql.us
PDXPUG - http://pugs.postgresql.org/pdx
Me - http://www.chesnok.com/daily
