Re: sub-select in IN clause results in sequential scan - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Angayarkanni
Subject Re: sub-select in IN clause results in sequential scan
Date
Msg-id 2a77004c0910290332x6cb5de43l284fb8060083a414@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: sub-select in IN clause results in sequential scan  (Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: sub-select in IN clause results in sequential scan
List pgsql-performance

2009/10/29 Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman@gmail.com>


On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Anj Adu <fotographs@gmail.com> wrote:
Postgres consistently does a sequential scan on the child partitions
for this query

select * from partitioned_table
where partitioned_column > current_timestamp - interval 8 days
where x in (select yy from z where colname like 'aaa%')

If I replace the query with

select * from partitioned_table
where partitioned_column > current_timestamp - interval 8 days
where x in (hardcode_value)

The results are in line with expectation (very fast and uses a Bitmap
Index Scan on the column X)
\

use JOIN luke..
 

--
GJ

Yes you try by using Join

JAK

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
Date:
Subject: Re: sub-select in IN clause results in sequential scan
Next
From: Anj Adu
Date:
Subject: Re: sub-select in IN clause results in sequential scan