Re: wal segment size - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Laurenz Albe
Subject Re: wal segment size
Date
Msg-id 2a301859ab47c2e83ba5c8ebf75112d61246a8cd.camel@cybertec.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to wal segment size  ("Colin 't Hart" <colinthart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: wal segment size
List pgsql-general
On Wed, 2025-12-17 at 16:13 +0100, Colin 't Hart wrote:
> I see very little advice on tuning WAL segment size.
>
> One of my clients has a few datawarehouses at around 8 - 16 TB
>
> On one of the nodes there are approx 15000 WAL segments of 16MB each, totalling
> approx 230GB. The archiver is archiving approx one per second, so approx 4 hours to clear.
>
> Would we gain anything by bumping the WAL segment size?

Very likely yes, if the problem is the overhead of starting the archive_command.

Another thing that can slow down archiving is if you compress these segments
too aggressively.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Ron Johnson
Date:
Subject: Re: Record last SELECT on a row?
Next
From: Ron Johnson
Date:
Subject: Re: wal segment size