> On 24 Mar 2022, at 06:17, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote:
> The comment and errmsg_plural don't seem to be consistent. When the
> code was added by c4f2a0458d, it had only singular form and already
> had the comment. After that 8032d76b5 turned it to errmsg_plural
> ignoring the comment. It seems like a thinko of 8032d76b5.
Following the bouncing ball, that seems like a reasonable conclusion, and
removing the plural form should be fine to reduce translator work.
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
