> On 4 Apr 2024, at 00:06, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
>> On 3 Apr 2024, at 19:38, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> Bottom line for me is that pulling 1.0.1 support now is OK,
>>> but I think pulling 1.0.2 is premature.
>
>> Is Red Hat building and and shipping v17 packages for RHEL7 ELS customers? If
>> not then it seems mostly academical to tie our dependencies to RHEL ELS unless
>> I'm missing something.
>
> True, they won't be doing that, and neither will Devrim. So maybe
> we can leave RHEL7 out of the discussion, in which case there's
> not a lot of reason to keep 1.0.2 support. We'll need to notify
> buildfarm owners to adjust their configurations.
The patch will also need to be adjusted to work with LibreSSL, but I know Jacob
was looking into that so ideally we should have something to review before
the weekend.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
