From: "Noah Misch" <noah@leadboat.com>
> I like (2), at least at a high level. The concept of errno_str.patch is
> safe
> enough to back-patch. One can verify that it only changes behavior when
> strerror() returns NULL, an empty string, or something that begins with
> '?'.
> I can't see resenting the change when that has happened.
Thanks for reviewing the patch.
> Question-mark-damaged messages are not limited to strerror(). A
> combination
> like lc_messages=ja_JP, encoding=LATIN1, lc_ctype=en_US will produce
> question
> marks for PG and libc messages even with the
> bind_textdomain_codeset("libc")
> change. Is it worth doing anything about that? That one looks
> self-inflicted
> in comparison to the lc_messages=ja_JP, encoding=UTF8, lc_ctype=C case.
Year, that might be a bit self-inflicted. But the problem may not happen
with lc_messages=ja_JP.UTF-8 and lc_ctype=en_US.UTF-8. Anyway, I want to
see this as a separate issue.
Regards
MauMau
