-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- --On Wednesday, April 09, 2008 21:38:29 -0400 Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
wrote:
> I think there is concern that trivial patches wouldn't be submitted to a
> patch tracker, especially by new submitters.
Can I see a show of hands as to who (other then Bruce) is concerned that new
submitters are too lazy to submit their patches through a proper patch tracker
vs simply sending via email?
I could see it with older submitters, who are used to just sending an email,
but the new guys will go with whatever procedure is laid out for them *as long
as* it is enforced ...
- --
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (FreeBSD)
iEYEARECAAYFAkf9dPoACgkQ4QvfyHIvDvP3vwCg5+PG39xHUDhiDUKPcEzH8fZi
Ei4An140iNV/q/Ne/B7NpsziNDXQaIoU
=PlXR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----