> I've also thought a similar implementation but there seems
> a problem of efficiency.
> As far as I see wcsftime() is almost = strftime() + mbstowcs()
> and so using strftime() is effective at least for the following
> cases.
>
> 1) LC_CTIME is "C".
> 2) LC_CTYPE != C and the database encoding != UTF-8. In this
> case the current restriction of PostgreSQL requires that
> the database encoding matches the encoding of the LC_CTYPE.
>
> We seem to be able to call strftime() directly in above cases.
>
> Comments ?
I quite agree on that point.
==
遅くまですみません、、もう寝ましょう:-)
Regards,
Hiroshi Saito