On Jun 30, 2014, at 1:39 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
>
>> Another item of note is the system catalogs are quite bloated:
>> Would that cause the replica to spin on StandbyReleaseLocks?
>
> AFAIK, no. It's an unsurprising consequence of heavy use of short-lived
> temp tables though.
>
Yah, this has been an issue in the past, so we tend to cluster them regularly during off-hours to minimize the issue.
> So it seems like we have a candidate explanation. I'm a bit surprised
> that StandbyReleaseLocks would get this slow if there are only a dozen
> AccessExclusiveLocks in place at any one time, though. Perhaps that
> was a low point and there are often many more?
>
>
Entirely possible that it was a low point. We'll set up some monitoring to track the number of AccessExclusiveLocks
andsee how much variance there is throughout the day.
