Re: postgresql vs mysql - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Jim Nasby
Subject Re: postgresql vs mysql
Date
Msg-id 2E232049-B976-4132-8C09-7C2486384655@decibel.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: postgresql vs mysql  ("Brandon Aiken" <BAiken@winemantech.com>)
Responses Re: postgresql vs mysql  ("Brandon Aiken" <BAiken@winemantech.com>)
Re: postgresql vs mysql  ("Andrej Ricnik-Bay" <andrej.groups@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Feb 21, 2007, at 2:23 PM, Brandon Aiken wrote:
> IMX, the only things going for MySQL are:
> 1. It's fast.

That depends greatly on what you're doing with it. Generally, as soon
as you start throwing a multi-user workload at it, MySQL stops
scaling. http://tweakers.net recently did a study on that.
--
Jim Nasby                                            jim@nasby.net
EnterpriseDB      http://enterprisedb.com      512.569.9461 (cell)



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Mark Walker
Date:
Subject: Re: php professional
Next
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: Out of memory on vacuum analyze