On Aug 9, 2004, at 7:06 PM, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Michael Glaesemann wrote:
>> On Aug 9, 2004, at 6:42 PM, Oliver Fromme wrote:
>>
>
> My example was a bit simplified for the matter.
Regardless, there's no reason not to use currval on the sequence. It's
transaction safe, as explained in both the link I posted previously and
in the FAQ.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html (4.15.1 through 4.15.4)
Michael Glaesemann
grzm myrealbox com
