Re: Interesting paper: Contention-Aware Lock Scheduling - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Evgeniy Shishkin
Subject Re: Interesting paper: Contention-Aware Lock Scheduling
Date
Msg-id 2B59EC36-30D0-46F7-B636-F2BE8E7CE7E8@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Interesting paper: Contention-Aware Lock Scheduling  (Garym <garym@oedata.com>)
Responses Re: Interesting paper: Contention-Aware Lock Scheduling  (Garym <garym@oedata.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

> On Apr 13, 2018, at 20:46, Garym <garym@oedata.com> wrote:
>
> LDFS does show improvements for certain workloads, however it sacrifices temporal order and may interfere with
historicalanalytics. If applications can tolerate ambiguous order of processing, it shows good gains.  

AFAIK, we don't guarantee order of processing anyway. Just some order.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Garym
Date:
Subject: Re: Interesting paper: Contention-Aware Lock Scheduling
Next
From: Garym
Date:
Subject: Re: Interesting paper: Contention-Aware Lock Scheduling