> On Nov 3, 2021, at 5:35 AM, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>> On 15 Oct 2021, at 23:54, Cary Huang <cary.huang@highgo.ca> wrote:
>>
>> I scanned through the GUC list and found that the following parameters can
>> potentially be categorized in the "special_disabled0" group, just for your
>> reference.
>
>
> This patch no longer applies, can you please submit a rebased version? Also,
> do you have any thoughts on Cary's suggestion in the above review?
Hi, enclosed is a v3, which includes the rebase as well as the additional int GUCs mentioned in Cary’s review. I can
addsupport for Reals (required for the JIT and several other ones), but wanted to get feedback/buy-in on the overall
ideafirst.
Best,
David
