Re: data=writeback - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Priem, Alexander
Subject Re: data=writeback
Date
Msg-id 2A07EC2D0BC2774AAD6F74769F60D52A0832C8@ahmose.cict_ad.nl
Whole thread Raw
In response to data=writeback  ("Priem, Alexander" <ap@cict.nl>)
Responses Re: data=writeback  (Chris <list@1006.org>)
List pgsql-performance
> > LABEL=/usr/local/pgsql  /usr/local/pgsql      ext3
> > noatime,data=writeback  1 2
> > LABEL=/usr/local/pgsql  /usr/local/pgsql/wal  ext3
> > noatime,data=ordered    1 2
>
> The same label mounted on two different mount points is probably I typo?


No, the same label mounted on two different mount points is not a typo. This
is the way it is in my /etc/fstab.

Note that I did not create this file myself, it was created by the RedHat
Enterprise Linux 3 ES installer. I created different partitions for the data
directory (/usr/local/pgsql) and the wal directory (/usr/local/pgsql/wal)
using the installer and this is how the /etc/fstab file ended up.

Why, is this bad? They use the same label, but use different mount points?
Can this cause problems?


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Chris
Date:
Subject: Re: data=writeback
Next
From: Chris
Date:
Subject: Re: data=writeback