Re: Extensions vs. shared procedural language handler functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Extensions vs. shared procedural language handler functions
Date
Msg-id 29976.1299289772@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Extensions vs. shared procedural language handler functions  (Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org> writes:
> ITYM plperl only, because plpython does not have a trusted variant. But
> there might be another obstacle here: plpython comes in two variants:
> plpython2u and plpython3u, and which one is built depends on the compile
> time configuration. Not sure how that plays with extensions...

Sorry, you're right, that issue is actually plpythonu and plpython2u
sharing the same handler.  It's basically the same problem though.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jan Urbański
Date:
Subject: Re: Extensions vs. shared procedural language handler functions
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Alpha4 release blockers (was Re: wrapping up this CommitFest)