"patrick k ." <patrick+pgsql@pioneerdigital.com> writes:
> There seems to be a slight uncertainty on what and how should our
> software provide all that is required to conform to the
> PostgreSQL (BSD) licensing terms and conditions.
By and large, the BSD license doesn't put *any* requirements on you.
We'd get unhappy if you tried to claim you owned Postgres, but short
of that you can include it in your product without any problem.
> - Is including the COPYRIGHT file from the PostgreSQL sources as
> part of our distribution be:
> + Sufficient?
> + A starting point?
Sufficient, certainly; some would say you needn't do even that.
If you wanted to mention "This product uses PostgreSQL, which you can
learn more about at http://www.postgresql.org/" then everyone would be
happy. You need not do that, but it'd be a polite thing to do.
> - Do we need to have a hardcopy of the contents in COPYRIGHT
> file included with our hardcopy documentation?
Not if you don't want to.
> - Should any of our software display PostgreSQL Copyright
> information:
Not required. The strictest reading of the BSD license is that
the notice has to be present somewhere in your distribution.
Putting it on a splash screen is surely more than is needed.
regards, tom lane
