Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Bad behaviour when inserting unspecified variable length datatypes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Bad behaviour when inserting unspecified variable length datatypes
Date
Msg-id 29856.999751794@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bad behaviour when inserting unspecified variable length datatypes  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
I wrote:
> I propose that we define typdefault as containing the *external*
> representation of the desired value, and have get_typdefault apply the
> type's input conversion function to produce a Datum.  Any objections?

This change is committed for 7.2.
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: timestamp with/without time zone
Next
From: Peter Harvey
Date:
Subject: Inherited Table