Re: DROP OWNED BY fails to drop privileges granted by non-owners (was Re: [GENERAL] Bug, Feature, or what else?) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: DROP OWNED BY fails to drop privileges granted by non-owners (was Re: [GENERAL] Bug, Feature, or what else?)
Date
Msg-id 29845.1360346947@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: DROP OWNED BY fails to drop privileges granted by non-owners (was Re: [GENERAL] Bug, Feature, or what else?)  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: DROP OWNED BY fails to drop privileges granted by non-owners (was Re: [GENERAL] Bug, Feature, or what else?)  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@gmail.com> writes:
> I am not sure I am following. Are we talking two different cases here?

What I was pointing out was that the non-superuser case seems to be
broken almost completely, whereas the superuser case is only broken
if the object owner has given away some grant options and those have
been exercised.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Phil Sorber
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility)
Next
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: DROP OWNED BY fails to drop privileges granted by non-owners (was Re: [GENERAL] Bug, Feature, or what else?)