Re: UCT (Re: pgsql: Update time zone data files to tzdata release 2019a.) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: UCT (Re: pgsql: Update time zone data files to tzdata release 2019a.)
Date
Msg-id 29832.1560987044@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: UCT (Re: pgsql: Update time zone data files to tzdata release 2019a.)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> So I'm toying with the idea of extending Andrew's patch to put a negative
> preference on "localtime", ensuring we'll use some other name for the zone
> if one is available.

Oh ... after further review it seems like "posixrules" should be
de-preferred on the same basis: it's uninformative and unportable,
and it's short enough to have a good chance of capturing initdb's
attention.  I recall having seen at least one machine picking it
recently.

Moreover, while I think most tzdb installations have that file (ours
certainly do), the handwriting is on the wall for it to go away,
leaving only postmaster startup failures behind:

http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tz/2019-June/028172.html

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: UCT (Re: pgsql: Update time zone data files to tzdata release 2019a.)
Next
From: Andrew Gierth
Date:
Subject: Re: UCT (Re: pgsql: Update time zone data files to tzdata release 2019a.)