Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 09:04 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I wasn't trying to start
>> a discussion about general project policies, but about the specific
>> status of this particular group of patches.
> Which ones exactly?
Well, one of the things that makes me uncomfortable is that it's not
even clear exactly which set of patches is currently proposed for
inclusion. We've seen a whole lot of URLs fly back and forth, many
of them pointing at pages that aren't there a few days later.
I've been too busy with non-replication-related patches to pay really
close attention, but I certainly don't get the impression that there's
a stable set of patches waiting to be applied. (And for the record,
there is nothing I like even a little bit about the practice of posting
a URL instead of an actual patch.)
regards, tom lane
