Re: Building PG 8.2.3 for x86_64 on Mac OS X 10.4.9 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Building PG 8.2.3 for x86_64 on Mac OS X 10.4.9
Date
Msg-id 29809.1177082516@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Building PG 8.2.3 for x86_64 on Mac OS X 10.4.9  (Kevin Murphy <murphy@genome.chop.edu>)
List pgsql-general
Kevin Murphy <murphy@genome.chop.edu> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hmm ... not sure if this is related, but there's something mighty fishy
>> about that "key" parameter.  I'd expect to see key=5432001, or something
>> close to that depending on what port number you're using.
>>
> But is this the case when doing 'make check'?

Oh, right, at that point it's a standalone backend not a postmaster,
so no port.  Never Mind ...

> Since the ENOMEM problem occurs in a simple shared memory test program,
> I'm inquiring on an Apple dev list.

Sounds like a plan.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Kevin Murphy
Date:
Subject: Re: Building PG 8.2.3 for x86_64 on Mac OS X 10.4.9
Next
From: RPK
Date:
Subject: Schema relationship diagram