Re: Proposal: Generic WAL logical messages - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Proposal: Generic WAL logical messages
Date
Msg-id 29792.1459952692@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal: Generic WAL logical messages  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: Proposal: Generic WAL logical messages  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2016-04-06 10:15:59 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Well, that's something worth thinking about.  I assume that
>> pg_logical_slot_get_changes could be executed in a database different from
>> the one where a change was originated?

> You can execute it, but you'll get an error:

Oh good.  I was afraid we had an unrecognized can o' worms here.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: Generic WAL logical messages
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: Generic WAL logical messages