Re: Application name patch - v3 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Application name patch - v3
Date
Msg-id 29753.1262037564@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Application name patch - v3  (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>)
Responses Re: Application name patch - v3  (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>)
List pgsql-hackers
Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> writes:
> Le 28/12/2009 17:06, Tom Lane a �crit :
>> I think we were stalled on the question of whether to use one array
>> or two parallel arrays.  Do you want to try coding up a sample usage
>> of each possibility so we can see which one seems more useful?

> I'm interested in working on this. But I don't find the thread that talk
> about this.

Try here
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4AAE8CCF.9070808@esilo.com
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: Admission Control Policy
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Admission Control Policy