Re: Should we use make -k on the buildfarm? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Should we use make -k on the buildfarm?
Date
Msg-id 29727.1289248696@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should we use make -k on the buildfarm?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Should we use make -k on the buildfarm?
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> On mån, 2010-11-08 at 15:01 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> First, the buildfarm doesn't build the docs. That's a deliberate 
>> decision, based on the fact that not every member has the required 
>> software installed. And second these targets only exist for 9.0 and/or
>> later.

> I'm aware of those issues.  I'm just saying you could consolidate things
> along those lines in the long term.

Probably not: your proposal depends on having "make" available, which it
won't be for Windows builds.  I doubt Andrew wishes to implement
make-equivalent logic in the buildfarm script.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Charles Pritchard
Date:
Subject: Re: W3C Specs: Web SQL
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we use make -k on the buildfarm?