Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> I ran the 150MB 4096 batch "sevenb" self-join with the "rotate" patch,
> and it worked as expected. I'm now planning to commit that version,
> unless there are objections or someone wants to argue for a different
> way to spell rotate() etc.
FWIW, I do want to argue for a different way to spell that. It seems
like a mighty generic function name --- in particular, there's no
hint of the word width we're rotating in. Maybe "rotate32" would be
good enough, though I'm tempted to propose "pg_rotate32" or "rotate_bit32"
or some other variation on that.
regards, tom lane
