Re: Linux 2.6.6 also - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Linux 2.6.6 also
Date
Msg-id 29692.1084402666@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Linux 2.6.6 also  (Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com> writes:
> But the change highlights one point: the order in which file blocks are 
> written to disk is undefined. Theoretically the wal checkpoint record 
> could be on the platter, but the preceeding pages were not written.
> Is that case handled by the wal replay code?

We don't care, unless of course the kernel returns claiming that fsync
is done when it's not all done yet.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Shachar Shemesh
Date:
Subject: Re: Probably security hole in postgresql-7.4.1
Next
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: threads stuff/UnixWare