Re: Shared memory - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Shared memory
Date
Msg-id 2966.1143563883@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Shared memory  (Thomas Hallgren <thomas@tada.se>)
Responses Re: Shared memory  (Thomas Hallgren <thomas@tada.se>)
List pgsql-hackers
Thomas Hallgren <thomas@tada.se> writes:
> This FENCED/NOT FENCED terminology would be a good way to
> differentiate between the two approaches. Any chance of that syntax
> making it into the PostgreSQL grammar, should the need arise?

Of what value would it be to have it in the grammar?  The behavior would
be entirely internal to any particular PL in any case.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: Why are default encoding conversions
Next
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: Why are default encoding conversions