Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC
Date
Msg-id 29655.1120084879@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC
List pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> Ok, finally managed though the peristent efforts of Mark Wong to get some 
> tests through.  Here are two tests with the CRC and wall buffer checking 
> completely cut out of the code, as Tom suggested:

Uh, what exactly did you cut out?  I suggested dropping the dumping of
full page images, but not removing CRCs altogether ...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: problem with plpgsql
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration