Re: autovacuum question - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: autovacuum question
Date
Msg-id 29638.1268105502@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: autovacuum question  ("Scot Kreienkamp" <SKreien@la-z-boy.com>)
Responses Re: autovacuum question  ("Scot Kreienkamp" <SKreien@la-z-boy.com>)
List pgsql-general
"Scot Kreienkamp" <SKreien@la-z-boy.com> writes:
>> Why not just add an 'analyze' as the last step of the restore job?

> Due to the amount of time it takes.  The disks are slow enough to make a
> database-wide analyze painful since I would have to repeat it every 1-2
> hours, IE every reload time.

You claimed that before.  It didn't make any sense then and it doesn't
now.  There is no way that an analyze is expensive compared to a
database reload.

Maybe what you need to be doing is rethinking the strategy that involves
reloading every couple of hours...

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Scot Kreienkamp"
Date:
Subject: Re: autovacuum question
Next
From: Sam Carleton
Date:
Subject: Re: managing tablespaces like files?