Re: plpgsql function changes? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: plpgsql function changes?
Date
Msg-id 29632.1119735770@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to plpgsql function changes?  (David Lazar <dlazar@resistorsoftware.com>)
List pgsql-general
David Lazar <dlazar@resistorsoftware.com> writes:
> ERROR: RETURN cannot have a parameter in function returning set; use
> RETURN NEXT at or near "pkg" at character 1149

> Did something change from pgsql 7.X series set returning function to
> version 8.X series???

I think 8.0 actually complains that you made a mistake, whereas 7.x
just silently ignores it.  It's still a mistake though.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: David Lazar
Date:
Subject: plpgsql function changes?
Next
From: Andreas
Date:
Subject: Re: Win32 users?