Re: Patch missing from back branches - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Patch missing from back branches
Date
Msg-id 29627.1525120046@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Patch missing from back branches  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Well, the commit suggests that we should be guided by what the buildfarm
> did, and then we never followed that up. I'd say in the light of
> experience we should backpatch it to the remaining live branches.

There are other VS2015 patches that were not pushed back further than
9.5, e.g. 0fb54de9a.  So I don't think we should push this one further
back than that.  But it'd be consistent to put it in 9.5.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch missing from back branches
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Support Python 3 tests under MSVC