Re: Extension Packaging - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David E. Wheeler
Subject Re: Extension Packaging
Date
Msg-id 295F3CF2-E254-480A-8D3F-3D7FDB7BDDFF@kineticode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Extension Packaging  (Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Apr 23, 2011, at 1:03 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:

> Daniele Varrazzo <daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com> writes:
>> For my extension I'm less concerned by having the install sql named in
>> different ways or by the upgrade sql as all these files are generated
>> by scripts. You may find useful this one
> 
> You can also generate that reliably in SQL.  You install your extension
> with CREATE EXTENSION then run the query over pg_depend and you have it
> all.  Then you can test this upgrade script you just got in SQL.  Tom
> also has a version that does the necessary string replacements using sed
> from a bash script rather than the SQL replace() function.
> 
>  http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-02/msg01208.php
>  http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-02/msg01438.php

Nice. Did you and Tom ever work out the difference in results?
 http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-02/msg01572.php

I'd like to see this documented somewhere, perhaps in 
 http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/extend-extensions.html

Thanks,

David




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jaime Casanova
Date:
Subject: Re: time-delayed standbys
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: windows consolidated cleanup