Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org> writes:
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 20:13, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> If open_dsync is so bad for performance on Linux, maybe it's bad
>> everywhere? Should we be rethinking the default preference order?
> So I think we should aim to fix old versions first. Do you disagree?
What's that got to do with it?
regards, tom lane