Re: Confusing results with lateral references - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Confusing results with lateral references
Date
Msg-id 29544.1449242780@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Confusing results with lateral references  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> There's another seemingly wrong result, not with lateral, but with FOR
> UPDATE.

[ shrug... ]  You're getting the post-update images of the two join
rows that would have been reported without FOR UPDATE.  This one is
definitely not a bug.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Confusing results with lateral references
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Remaining 9.5 open items