Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II
Date
Msg-id 29532.1055086722@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II  (Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> "wal_debug" is seldom used outside of Postgresql source development or unusual 
> system failures, and should therefore go last.

BTW, it occurs to me that wal_debug is one of the hacker-only variables
that probably ought not be documented at all.  I cannot imagine any use
for it for the average DBA.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Nigel J. Andrews"
Date:
Subject: Re: large objects
Next
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: cvs ETA?