Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable?
Date
Msg-id 29530.1256143032@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable?  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
Responses Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable?
List pgsql-hackers
"David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes:
> On Oct 21, 2009, at 7:27 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Huh, it looks to me like that's an error in the declaration of the
>> citext versions of regexp_matches --- they should be declared to  
>> return
>> setof text[], the same as the underlying text functions.  David, do  
>> you agree?

> Ooh, yeah, dunno how I missed that.

I think we're probably stuck in 8.4, but we should fix it going
forward.  Would you make a quick check if any of the other citext
functions have the same bug?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: URL Managment - C Function help
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Hot standby, prepared xacts, locks