Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?
Date
Msg-id 29490.1176139031@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?  (Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>)
Responses Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?  (Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> writes:
> I think I'll be able to set up my HP-UX 11.11 box here, as soon as it gets
> fixed, and assuming either the bundled compiler will work or I can get
> GCC on it.

If the bundled compiler is still the same non-ANSI-C weakling that was
bundled in HPUX 10, there's no chance.  It would be great to have a
buildfarm member using HP's real ANSI-spec C compiler though.
I still do a lot of my own development on HPUX 10 + gcc, so I'm not
particularly worried about lack of that combination in the buildfarm.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: PGPROCs of autovac workers (was Re: [PATCHES] autovacuum multiworkers, patch 5)
Next
From: Mark Shuttleworth
Date:
Subject: Re: elog(FATAL) vs shared memory