Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> How does GIST set this field?
I didn't say GIST *set* it, I said GIST *used* it --- and your patch
would've changed GIST's behavior.
Perhaps the field is not really necessary, but some detailed analysis
would be required to establish that. I'm not very clear on what GIST
is doing with it.
regards, tom lane
