Re: libedit broke in head - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: libedit broke in head
Date
Msg-id 29476.1159729228@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: libedit broke in head  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: libedit broke in head  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> I really don't get the libedit-preferred syntax? Why not just:

> --with-libedit     use BSD Libedit not GNU Readline
> --with-readline use GNU Readline not BSD Libedit
> --without-readline do not use GNU Readline nor BSD Libedit

Well, the point is that the current configure behavior usually does the
right thing *without* any switches.  If we made it behave as above then
the user would be forced to specify which library was installed on his
system, which is a bit pedantic when most platforms will have only one.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch
Next
From: ssinger_pg@sympatico.ca
Date:
Subject: 8.2beta1 failure on IRIX