Re: Pushing btree opclass implementor's docs to the main SGML docs - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Pushing btree opclass implementor's docs to the main SGML docs
Date
Msg-id 29452.1517948765@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Pushing btree opclass implementor's docs to the main SGML docs  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-docs
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2/5/18 18:51, Tom Lane wrote:
>> So I can see two ways to approach this: add two new subsections at the end
>> of xindex.sgml, or create a new chapter about b-trees in Part VII
>> ("Internals") to go beside the existing ones about the more recently added
>> index types.  The latter would make more sense if anyone was inspired to
>> write something comparable in length to the existing per-index-type
>> chapters.  But I'm not volunteering to do that, so if it's a chapter it'd
>> be a mighty thin one to start with.

> xindex seems better to me.

Oh, I already did it as a chapter.  I'm inclined to think that somebody
will want to write something more there someday, and anyway it's already
longer than some existing chapters ...

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Pushing btree opclass implementor's docs to the main SGML docs
Next
From: PG Doc comments form
Date:
Subject: Jr Software Engineer