> On 1 Jul 2024, at 21:15, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> On 2024-Jul-01, Ranier Vilela wrote:
>>> - char name[MAXPGPATH + 1];
>>> + char name[MAXPGPATH];/* backup label name */
>>>
>>> With the introduced use of strlcpy, why do we need to change this field?
>>>
>> The part about being the only reference in the entire code that uses
>> MAXPGPATH + 1.
>
> The bit I don't understand about this discussion is what will happen
> with users that currently have exactly 1024 chars in backup names today.
> With this change, we'll be truncating their names to 1023 chars instead.
> Why would they feel that such change is welcome?
That's precisely what I was getting at. Maybe it makes sense to change, maybe
not, but that's not for this patch to decide as that's a different discussion
from using safe string copying API's.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
