Re: PG 11 feature count - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: PG 11 feature count
Date
Msg-id 29407.1526654970@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PG 11 feature count  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: PG 11 feature count  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Just yesterday Andres was telling us that pg11 has so much new stuff,
> when compared to 9.5 and 9.6, that seemed to have not as much shiny
> things.  I think it's all in the eye of the beholder; our releases are
> large, and getting larger every year.

Yeah.  My feeling for the last year or two has been that so much
development is happening that I can't keep track of it all.

Much of it is in the direction of "better performance", and I think
Bruce's opinion of what's a documentable feature is biased against
including that type of change.  So that might account for some of
these numbers, too.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_basebackup -k option
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers