Re: [GENERAL] pg_restore misuse or bug? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [GENERAL] pg_restore misuse or bug?
Date
Msg-id 29286.1500645803@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to [GENERAL] pg_restore misuse or bug?  (Jordan Gigov <coladict@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] pg_restore misuse or bug?  (Jordan Gigov <coladict@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
Jordan Gigov <coladict@gmail.com> writes:
> When running pg_restore as the superuser it gives the following error
> pg_restore: [archiver (db)] Error while PROCESSING TOC:
> pg_restore: [archiver (db)] Error from TOC entry 3253; 0 320628
> MATERIALIZED VIEW DATA combined_query_data web_user
> pg_restore: [archiver (db)] could not execute query: ERROR:
> permission denied for relation first_table_in_from_list
>     Command was: REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW combined_query_data;

What PG version is this?  Can you provide a self-contained test case?

> I see no reason why the superuser would get a "permission denied"
> error.

Matview queries are run as the owner of the matview, so this isn't
as surprising as all that.  But if the matview works in your normal
usage, then pg_dump must be doing something wrong, perhaps emitting
grants in the wrong order.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: marcelo
Date:
Subject: [GENERAL] Schemas and foreign keys
Next
From: Andreas Kretschmer
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Schemas and foreign keys