Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to> writes:
> So I'm developing a patch to fix this issue, but I'm not
> exactly sure what the configuration should look like. I see multiple
> options, but the one I like the best is the following:
> Add two new HBA configuration options: radiusfallbackservers and
> radiusfallbackports; both lists parsed with SplitIdentifierString (à la
> listen_addresses).
Why add new GUCs for that? Can't we just redefine radiusserver as a list
of servers to try in sequence, and similarly split radiusport into a list?
Or maybe better, rename it radius_servers. But what you have here seems
weird, and it certainly doesn't follow the precedent of what we did when
we replaced listen_address with listen_addresses.
regards, tom lane
