Re: Problem with indices from 10 to 13 - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Problem with indices from 10 to 13
Date
Msg-id 2920281.1632868873@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: Problem with indices from 10 to 13  (Daniel Diniz <daniel@flashcourier.com.br>)
Responses RE: Problem with indices from 10 to 13  (Daniel Diniz <daniel@flashcourier.com.br>)
List pgsql-performance
Daniel Diniz <daniel@flashcourier.com.br> writes:
> The index I use is the GIN.

pg_trgm, you mean?  That answers one question, but you still didn't
explain what type h.nome_des is, nor how bytea and convert_from()
are getting into the picture.

The second part of that is probably not critical, since the planner
should be willing to reduce the convert_from() call to a constant
for planning purposes, so I'm unclear as to why the estimate for
the ilike clause is so bad.  Have you tried increasing the statistics
target for h.nome_des to see if the estimate gets better?

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Alan Hodgson
Date:
Subject: Re: Problem with indices from 10 to 13
Next
From: Daniel Diniz
Date:
Subject: RE: Problem with indices from 10 to 13